Thursday, February 26, 2015

Journal 2: SMART (and other) goals

     SMART is an acronym for the criteria to consider when setting a goal, and stands for
·         Specific
·         Measurable
·         Achievable
·         Relevant
·         Timely

      Taking these in context of Loewenstern, there are a number of areas within which I can set SMART goals for myself. Perhaps the most obvious would be with respect to my service with CURA. While my specific project details have yet to be released to me, I hope to have the chance to be responsible for a project that I can implement within 6 weeks and will continue to benefit either CURA or the village residents after my service ends. Nevertheless, I also understand that trying to complete a project of my own may not be in the best interests either party—and will adjust this goal accordingly as I learn more about the project I am to complete. An interesting word of advice I received from the Rice faculty I met with last week certainly applies to this. She told me to go over the project description once I received it and to make a detailed schedule of what would be done each week and have it reviewed by my contact in CURA to make sure it was reasonable. The professor warned me of the tendency for projects to have vague objectives, which would ultimately result in less being accomplished if not further defined. This helped to reinforce the importance of creating SMART goals.
     From class on Tuesday, I was able to flesh out additional goals; another related to the project is to be self-sufficient by the end of my first week with CURA, both in terms of housing/transportation, but also with respect to my service project so as to maximize my effective service time with CURA. In terms of language goals—I have had an ongoing goal to be reading 1-2 pages of Chinese every day prior to my service trip to continue developing my proficiency and facilitate the transition process. Once I receive more technical documents relating to my project, I plan to have read them in Chinese prior to my trip in order to gain a working vocabulary of technical terms. Given how well SMART goals lend themselves to quantifiable outcomes, I set a few more personal SMART goals—I would like to learn how to cook three Sichuan/regional dishes during my stay in order to share back home. I also anticipate writing in my personal journal at least once a week.
     As for the less quantitative goals, such as developing close personal relationships with the CURA staff and perhaps even the residents of the village, I thought these goals might best be measured by the intentions approach that was discussed. I value learning from others’ experiences as well as challenging myself, thus pushing myself to break out of my ‘comfort zone’ and growing relationships with those around me would be well-aligned with this intention. I also value practicality and application, which I hope will translate into me taking an active hands-on approach with respect to my service with CURA, such as learning the technical skills relevant to water quality testing, as well as those associated with generating awareness among the target audience. I anticipate being able to use these skills back home, not only with a local organization focused on water quality and conservation, but also in other future endeavors as well. Despite ‘intention goals’ being ‘in the moment’, I believe these goals can also be future-minded, in the sense that the goals I have set relate to post-trip service/application. After all, my values are an inherent part of me—continually influenced by my actions and influencing my actions. By shaping my values, this trip will have a lasting impact on me, and by extension my post-trip service plans. 

Tuesday, February 10, 2015

Journal 1: International Service Reflections



I have always been aware of the dichotomous nature international service, of how it is a channel capable of bringing not only tremendous benefit to a community but also tremendous detriment as well. Ivan Illich’s speech ‘To Hell with Good Intentions’ highlighted the many flaws associated with international ‘dogooders,’ whose lack of training, applicable knowledge, and linguistic abilities only goes to hurt rather than help the community. While his argument was not new to me, I was still shocked by the fact that the Peace Corps spends near $10,000 to help their members ‘adjust’ to the new environment and overcome culture shock. Clearly, this type of service is not sustainable and should be avoided in all circumstances. On the other hand, while the projects implemented by FSD participants also fall under the broad category of international service, they are radically different. The skills, outlook, and training the participants bring to the community result in self-sustaining programs such as the bike-cab and rental program developed by the student during his period of service with a local organization. I agree with his definition of success—when the program can operate without his involvement. This goes to show that international service can be meaningful to both the participant and the community. To me, this is certainly worth pursuing. By looking at the assets of the community and how they can be used to build the community, a participant can help the community to help themselves. This is a jarring contrast to the conventional needs-based approach, which creates a damaging dependence of the community on the participant, an outsider.
My recommendations are aligned with the criteria I set for myself when applying to be a Loewenstern scholar. Familiar with the asset-based outlook from ASB, I wanted to be able to contribute towards the goals of the organization rather hinder their efforts due to deficiencies on my part. Thus, I looked for opportunities in China, which would help minimize the language and culture barrier. I also sought service opportunities needing skills that overlapped with my existing skill set so that I could devote more time to service without facing a steep learning curve. Nevertheless, while relevant skills and preparation are crucial for an international service participant, an open mind is just as important in order to truly facilitate sustainable community development. The participant cannot attempt to implement their own agenda, but must develop an agenda in accordance with the community. The participant should be a catalyst, not the origin.