Journal 1: International Service Reflections

I have always been aware of the dichotomous nature international service, of how it is a channel capable of bringing not only tremendous benefit to a community but also tremendous detriment as well. Ivan Illich’s speech ‘To Hell with Good Intentions’ highlighted the many flaws associated with international ‘dogooders,’ whose lack of training, applicable knowledge, and linguistic abilities only goes to hurt rather than help the community. While his argument was not new to me, I was still shocked by the fact that the Peace Corps spends near $10,000 to help their members ‘adjust’ to the new environment and overcome culture shock. Clearly, this type of service is not sustainable and should be avoided in all circumstances. On the other hand, while the projects implemented by FSD participants also fall under the broad category of international service, they are radically different. The skills, outlook, and training the participants bring to the community result in self-sustaining programs such as the bike-cab and rental program developed by the student during his period of service with a local organization. I agree with his definition of success—when the program can operate without his involvement. This goes to show that international service can be meaningful to both the participant and the community. To me, this is certainly worth pursuing. By looking at the assets of the community and how they can be used to build the community, a participant can help the community to help themselves. This is a jarring contrast to the conventional needs-based approach, which creates a damaging dependence of the community on the participant, an outsider.

My recommendations are aligned with the criteria I set for myself when applying to be a Loewenstern scholar. Familiar with the asset-based outlook from ASB, I wanted to be able to contribute towards the goals of the organization rather hinder their efforts due to deficiencies on my part. Thus, I looked for opportunities in China, which would help minimize the language and culture barrier. I also sought service opportunities needing skills that overlapped with my existing skill set so that I could devote more time to service without facing a steep learning curve. Nevertheless, while relevant skills and preparation are crucial for an international service participant, an open mind is just as important in order to truly facilitate sustainable community development. The participant cannot attempt to implement their own agenda, but must develop an agenda in accordance with the community. The participant should be a catalyst, not the origin.